|
Troy,
I know, I'm a zealot when it comes to Canon cameras and DPP. : )
Software should not be the weakest link in the chain. There's no excuse for it. Especially when we've invested heavily in top notch gear and glass.
It can be argued that your clients, or anyone who visits your web gallery, wouldn't know the difference between which editor was used to convert the files, but, I know. And, that's enough for me.
My very, very simple yardstick is to see what ACR does to skin tones. :vomit:
Setting profiles to /try/ and emulate what the native/OEM software produces is a bit of a hack, and, again, enough for me to not warrant its use.
Besides, I simply adore DPP's very basic editing philosophy. To everyone else, use what makes you happy and gets money out of your clients.
H
P.S. I know I probably sound very arrogant when I continue to labour this point, but, this is just my not so humble opinion. And, everyone knows, that opinions are like nipples; everyone has at least one.
|