I can only ask ..how good is ones argument if one has to resort to facts
.
A hypothesis is a view or an idea and nothing more. Clearly maths can be offered in support claiming the math is indeed the only evidence required. However math should apply to analysis of the data rather than building a premise and so I ask what data gained from "sample" observation does "inflation" call upon?
Inflation has the math to prove to us that the seemingly impossible is reasonable and in the case of inflation math indeed can prove that all we can observe and or presume to be out there "grew" from zip to all there is in a split second..I feel science will need God to get that one off the ground... and maybe that is the conclusion the big bang leads folk to... to a consideration of a creator when the science leaves us wondering....and as such it would seem that math is indeed a very powerful tool if it can sway a reasonable person to accept its premise with nothing more...say like experiment or observation.
Beer is great.... but few discussions on these matters are pointless as discussion promotes interest and input.
alex
