[xelasnave]

You no doubt have surrendered the opportunity for consideration of the possibility that any universe, other than one set out via the big bang theory, is available for consideration and/or is indeed worthy of consideration...such approach eliminates alternatives..

Big bang theory in order to survive as a viable hypotheses needs the "theory of inflation" to explain reasonable concerns with the credibility of the "big bang theory" however the "inflation theory" determines that all and everything we can observe or consider to be, of, and making up our universe, grew from the size of a grape fruit (just a little bit after the initial big bang.. to a size of some 156 / 160 billion light years diameter in the time of 30 seconds (or less ..depending on the sums you select as reasonable..) As laughable as such a prospect may present to any reasonable person that seems to be the way the big bang theory is happy with the dealing with the detail...

When one glosses over the probability that such could be fact or possible then this view of the evolution of the universe casts concern for some folks simply because this means that accepting the notion that the entire universe was therefore created in under one minute...mmm science gives creation only one minute and the Pope give creation 6/7 days..when you think of it that way ...mmm... 6/7 days seems more acceptable even though it is entirely unacceptable. ...
yes we must accept that all we see observe etc was created in less than one minute thats the science of it...Such a realization of what the big bang theory asks us to accept demands a more reasonable alternative one could think... yet there is no alternative to the big bang view on universe birth and evolution so far it seems... .. If one can entertain a possibility that the big bang theory is only one of many options yet unresolved or defined and that current thought is not the limit of knowledge and then alternatives may be embraced... and that such alternative may be different to the current belief in a big bang approach ... so take away the big bang and consider an alternative universe where the question you raise in your post would never need to be asked because the model held no difficulties is explaining away inconsistencies...

We interperete our data on the basis that the big bang theory is fact and in doing so we eliminate any opportunity of alternatives and perhaps supporting an unsupportable view of the universe.

alex