View Single Post
  #22  
Old 13-07-2010, 04:48 PM
AndrewJ
Watch me post!

AndrewJ is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,905
Gday Andrew

Quote:
I guess you could call it 'real time error correction' instead of periodic. Maybe RTEC is a suitable acronym?
Its not really that either, its more like RPTEC ( Real "Part Time" )
All any of these systems do is try and make an encoder go at a certain rate. They dont address how the OTA flexes and how the sky tracking rates change. By having an encoder on the final axis, it eliminates the geartrain ( and hence any teeth errors ) from the feedback loops, but it cannot affect all the other downstream errors.
Its certainly a big step up from a system where a cheap encoder is on the motor, but there are still a lot of other errors that it cant deal with.

Quote:
Direct drive: no gears, no PE
Also very high price and still doesnt address all the other errors mentioned above. Its horses for courses.
Be good to see how the technology evolves, and a reduction in moving parts that have to be aligned would be nice, but it will still need a good encoder feedback system.

Andrew
Reply With Quote