Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvamundo
|
I don't believe in Time Travel...not one bit...I don't even believe that particles can either.
I view the dimension of Time as more of a variable Impedance or resistance to change...but for this to remain logical, I also must believe that particles carry the ability to exchange that Impedance when they interact...so they don't just interact, they exchange a latency value within the interaction. this is why i wrote "dynamic viscosity in a particle's interaction with other particles", and it also relates to the dimensional space around it. So tardiness is kind of a state and value. When tardiness is at it's minimum, we have minimal Impedance. Minimal Impedance of the dimensional space translates to movement at 'c'. In this way, 'c' tells us a bit about dimensional space and it's relationship to mass. It's kind of a Higgs field but without the need for a Higgs Boson.
In this way, this shared and transportable viscosity could affect the apperance of space, so we get Lorentz contraction with higher viscosity/latency, which also means slower interactions, or, Time Dilation.
If the information could be commuted across spacetime, in a type of metric, then it would not only adhere to SR, but it may tell us something about SR and the relationship between energy and dimensional space.
What would be the source of the viscosity or Impedance? Perhaps it's just a latency in the dynamism of specific particles (Fermions). Perhaps the value is shared within particle species...like String Theory claims.
All 100% hypothetical and impossible notions of course.
