View Single Post
  #21  
Old 31-05-2010, 03:05 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroJunk View Post
5 seconds is pretty good for that magnitude
Out of interest, seeing as I've been reminded about this thread.. I've done some more testing and definitely should have used shorter exposures than 5 seconds. For the upcoming June 4 occultation I'll be using 1 second exposures. At that exposure time I get 18 images per minute.

Roger.
Reply With Quote