Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward
I have yet to use my 16803 chip with the little Taka....Some lovely eye candy there Jase. Nicely done  
|
Thanks Peter. 239arcmins square on the FSQ provides plenty of imaging area real-estate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Humungous effort Jase, mucho panning right there, and masterfull stitching. Slightly duotonic red/white colour (apart from the stars), cant wait till you zoom in (when you run out of ww feilds, shortly)  .
|
Cheers Fred. Run out of wide fields.

Unless I mosaic the entire southern sky at 530mm, there is not chance of that happening - sorry to disappoint. That said variety is the spice of life, so will be sure to provide you with some long focal length work soon.
I did comprehend the duo tonal effect, but in the 1:1 original its not strong enough to worry about. I even acquired three hours of OIII data on Eta given its a strong OIII target to blend it, but found it dulled the impact of the Ha data. In retrospect, maybe if I make and OIII lum and OIII mapped colour it would have worked. Thanks for your comments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wysiwyg
Jase,
Very nice indeed.
I'm yet to discover the art of creating mosaics myself.
Mark
|
Cheers Mark. You've got the gear for mosaics thats for sure. The FSQ with its flat wide field is a treat. 530mm FL is just enough to grasp subtle features in moderately sized targets. I did a paid processing job for a guy in the US which entailed a nine panel mosaic of the horse head region at 4876mm FL (24"RC). That was a hair raising exercise in comparison to a wide field vista with the FSQ. Give it a go, no harm in trying. Thanks again.
====
Thanks all. Appreciate your comments and ongoing support.