View Single Post
  #29  
Old 23-05-2010, 08:53 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I have yet to use my 16803 chip with the little Taka....Some lovely eye candy there Jase. Nicely done
Thanks Peter. 239arcmins square on the FSQ provides plenty of imaging area real-estate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Humungous effort Jase, mucho panning right there, and masterfull stitching. Slightly duotonic red/white colour (apart from the stars), cant wait till you zoom in (when you run out of ww feilds, shortly) .
Cheers Fred. Run out of wide fields. Unless I mosaic the entire southern sky at 530mm, there is not chance of that happening - sorry to disappoint. That said variety is the spice of life, so will be sure to provide you with some long focal length work soon.

I did comprehend the duo tonal effect, but in the 1:1 original its not strong enough to worry about. I even acquired three hours of OIII data on Eta given its a strong OIII target to blend it, but found it dulled the impact of the Ha data. In retrospect, maybe if I make and OIII lum and OIII mapped colour it would have worked. Thanks for your comments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wysiwyg View Post
Jase,

Very nice indeed.
I'm yet to discover the art of creating mosaics myself.

Mark
Cheers Mark. You've got the gear for mosaics thats for sure. The FSQ with its flat wide field is a treat. 530mm FL is just enough to grasp subtle features in moderately sized targets. I did a paid processing job for a guy in the US which entailed a nine panel mosaic of the horse head region at 4876mm FL (24"RC). That was a hair raising exercise in comparison to a wide field vista with the FSQ. Give it a go, no harm in trying. Thanks again.

====
Thanks all. Appreciate your comments and ongoing support.
Reply With Quote