View Single Post
  #3  
Old 22-05-2010, 08:32 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Hi. Thanks. I didn't choose the equipment for planetary imaging specifically. It's my first telescope and I'm using it for astrophotography and visual work.

My understanding is, that increasing focal length reduces aperture. I guess my question is, when does aperture become limiting or impractical for DSLR astrophotography? There is a limit on visual observing, but I have read about the advantages of smaller apertures in terms of focus and definition - round stars - presume that smudginess is reduced.

I'm not sure, but I think this may be a matter of experience in the field and possibly a matter of opinion.

I guess there is plenty of literature on this subject, but there is no replacement for experience sometimes and I think this question may be one of those instances.

Last edited by rcheshire; 24-05-2010 at 05:18 AM. Reason: Clarity - intention
Reply With Quote