Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar
Nice image David with lots of detail but even with LP I would have expected a bit more for 7 hours worth. This imaging game can be a mongrel where loads of exposure doesn't always mean the best image. To many variables.
Still it's a nice image David but I can understand your disappointment.
Keep at it Mate.
|
thanks - youre quite correct far too many variables
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
Hell yeah. You'll probably put double or triple the integration time but the more you stack the better it'll get.  There's nothing you can't do from a light polluted sky that you can do at a dark site unless the sky count is higher than the the object you are trying to take a picture of. |
ok i am currently doing another 2 hours worth at iso 800, if i am lucky i will try to squeeze in another hour on that - it is getting windy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
Every 16 or so frames you gain an image brightness increase, noise disappears and eventually a great image. This can be very tough through light pollution. Not prepared to deal this anymore myself. A good image all the same. Maybe a little soft on the focus perhaps.
|
no Paul the focus was spot on - the seeing was the variable this time - was some thin cloud methinks
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
ZERO...? 
Still a great effort from your new observatory
Save such projects for dark skies where the seemingly impossible can become a reality.
Michentaurus A  |
Michentaurus the great, please accept my humble apology but i simply cant let go of this
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidTrap
I just hope my efforts will resemble your's David...
DT
|
well i am one above zero so you should blitz it
