Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvamundo
Hi Steven my relativist minder... 
I just think Dark Energy, Dark Matter are nothing more than mathematical descriptions of how far standard is off.... and no amount of mathematical hand waving is going to get these detectors to show anything, cos it aint there. Instead of reaching out to nature for a lesson, we are demanding it fit our model with matter never discovered in ALL other fields of science. Instead of using real physics, cosmology is wandering down a model demanding 95% new physics. |
Instead of making vague generalizations based on perceptions instead of facts why don't you demonstrate where the current science is wrong.
For example show me the logical inconsistancies in the GR theory of gravitational waves, since by your definition they don't exist hence the theory must be wrong.
Quote:
|
Argumentum ad ignorantiam applies for both for and against standard model in this instance...
|
No it doesn't. In this context argumentum ad ignorantiam is the result on making conclusions on non observations. Dark energy and dark matter are based on observations.
Regards
Steven