View Single Post
  #2  
Old 05-05-2010, 11:29 AM
Steffen's Avatar
Steffen
Ebotec Alpeht Sicamb

Steffen is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toongabbie, NSW
Posts: 1,976
I'd say you "see more" in an X mm refractor than in an X mm Cassegrain, simply because the latter has a smaller effective aperture (central obstruction). In addition, the Cassegrain has two reflective surfaces on top of the corrector lens with its two air-glass boundaries. This would affect the overall throughput as well.

Keep in mind that a short tube X mm refractor will have a much shorter focal length than an X mm Cassegrain and a much faster focal ratio, with everything that entails.

I believe what you may have heard is that an X mm Maksutov Cassegrain will rival a Y mm refractor, where X is somewhat larger than Y (as in 6" vs 4"). This stems from the fact that Maksutov designs are inherently well corrected for coma (and field curvature?) and good implementations have very good contrast giving a refractor-like view.

Cheers
Steffen.
Reply With Quote