Quote:
Originally Posted by jase
Great details extracted from the data set....but ummm..Nup. You've crossed the line Marcus. About the only credit I'll give you is that you didn't paint in your own stars. Harsh, but when you're doing collage work, you need defined separation. Bring on the full frame.
|
Thanks Jase, glad you appreciated what I was intending - to show concisely the detail in my unfinished image. No lines crossed at all IMO and I make no apologies whatsoever for how that was done, especially since I
clearly stated what I had done in the caption of my image.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF
Heck - just goes to show how slow I am - have only just realised the FOV has been condensed - retaining the PA of the galaxies relative to each other had me tricked.
I guess that's one vote to the "deception" camp, but I'm giving 2 votes to the "innovative" category - its just so engaging.
|
Another vote for not reading the caption to the image perhaps?
I think my only mistake was assuming everyone would immediately realise the "spacial adjustment" done in this very well known field
... hence the apology to the purists in my post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Ok ok... but I don't care what you say, there is NOTHING unusual or deceitful about this photo though ok!  ...especially what's in the trunks! |
Glad I could insert some controversy into your day
