Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvamundo
The author makes particular comment on exactly this SJ...Did you read all the material? You are suggesting a fundamental misunderstanding and misapplication of GR's equations for the subject matter, when it's in the title of the peer reviewed journal... Although possible, I doubt this would've gotten through Astronomische Nachrichten.
|
To suggest that peer review is a confirmation of the "correctness" of a journal......
"
There seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too trivial, no literature too biased or too egotistical, no design too warped, no methodology too bungled, no presentation of results too inaccurate, too obscure, and too contradictory, no analysis too self-serving, no argument too circular, no conclusions too trifling or too unjustified, and no grammar and syntax too offensive for a paper to end up in print." Drummond Rennie, deputy editor of Journal of the American Medical Association.
Plasma and mainstream cosmology involve the publication of peer reviewed journals yet both cannot be right.
Regards
Steven