Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Very good point. The only way to really resolve the question would be to have similar sized surveys of both quasars and galaxies done, to similar ranges for Z, similar detection limits and in all directions.
|
Just bear in mind with intrinsic redshift Z means a different thing... Selection effects are also of particular importance. The relationship of these objects to their parents objects are key with these statistics, as SJ mentioned the differences between intrinsic Vs cosmological redshift.
This image might help with that picture:
http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/fr...s/figure-2.jpg
Photo:
http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/re...figure_1_b.jpg
Close up with gas:
http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/re...figure_1_a.jpg
This NZ bloke kind of explains the differences of the models well, along with the hubble relationship issue:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr_CLZvXTIo
Intrinsic models also have to change nothing with regard to this new time dilation problem. It is in fact an expected feature.