Quote:
If the SDDS survey indicates that linear redshifts are incorrect then why does galaxy data not exhibit the same quantizied redshifts?
The answer is simple. The data size is far greater than for quasers.
The gaps in the quaser survey can represent a lack of data rather than any physical significance.
|
Or as per ejection model and Narlikar's model, quasars represent newly created matter, that step down in quantized redshift levels.
As the quasar is ejected, matter ages and steps down in redshift towards -->BLac objects --> towards the parent galaxy, an evolution so to speak. (along the bohr style suggestion)
This would explain why quasars (fresh matter) exhibit more distinct quantization, and galaxies (older objects) would tend to average out, as you have mentioned.
Consider the time spent in these steps: (aging from 1 --> 5)
1)New quasar (x units of time spent in this phase)
<new matter just ejected along minor axes of seyfert
2)Medium quasar (x + y units '')
3)Old quasar (x+ y +z units '')
4)Blac (x + y + z + a units '')
5)Galaxies (x + y + z + a + b units)
<old matter... close to base line level (along the bohr line of thinking)
You would naturally expect to see less quantization in a sky survey of objects in step 5.
A very different way of looking at galaxy evolution.
re NGC7319, hubble's law needs to stick it's head in the sand for this one.
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/...rect=migration
regards