Quote:
Originally Posted by OzRob
Is that really the case if you are comparing a DSLR with a OSC CCD? I have tried the DSLR that I have and basically it is not suitable for the job. I could get a Canon body and give that a shot but I think a OSC is the way to go. The cooling, no need for mods, better sensitivity and potential for automated multiple image capture (using dithering) with dedicated software seals the deal for me.
|
Disagree, in that the learning curve is much steeper with CCD (OSC included) for a "Noob". Focusing and framing with the focal length of scope that Paul is using may pose more immediate problems with a CCD camera.
No argument re the benefits for imaging of having a CCD over a DSLR - but I still think that the CCD's steep learning curve is not the best route for the beginner and may be off-putting for those unfamiliar with all the associated software needed to run these cameras.
Re your DSLR experience - I started off with a Pentax DSLR, which was no match for my Canon. Noise reduction and colour correction are far superior on the Canon DSLRs for astro work. Have a look at the photo links in Octane's ad I linked to in my post above - they speak for themselves as to the potential of the DSLR.
Doug
ps...I would love a CCD too!
Until then I have to champion the cause of the DSLR!!