Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvamundo
Yes! Couldn't agree more. I see evolutions of systems, organization, structure and resonance. However often vastly at odds with the requirements of the standard rule set and accompanying explanations, this can be confronting when attempting to seriously discuss.
|
True, but at the end of the day, this is simply a forum, and forums are for discussions. You could easily enforce restrictions to discussing what is popularly supported or that which you can make reference too (data)...but how many people would be here?!
Just be mindful that most people are fascinated not by numbers in mathematics, nor the data in science. They are in fact fascinated by the
relationship between the numbers in mathematics, and the
relationship between data in science.
Similarly, many people (as I am) are fascinated in the relationships between what we see and experience directly, and how science and philosophy connect to them. I feel the desire to know such details rests in the desire of the individual to understand the connection between themselves and the big picture.
The Right Hand Rule is simply piece of an overall puzzle, but the implications of a convention, or parity are far greater.