Adam i also agree. There is now enough genuine peer-reviewed information here now for anyone to follow...
My enthusiasm in argument was due to the ad hom dismissal, without any comments on the specifics of the science. You will see from the first post i was just a layman exploring, then it quickly degenerated into a Velikofsky Ad Hom attack (of which i never mentioned or even studied in depth that author). It is unreleated to this peer-reviewed paper. This is just bad science. I never used this technique in the history of the post.
I really dont see how a man (
Velikovsky) who was born in the 1800's and who published his work in 1950's has any relation to a genuine
IEEE plasma physics 2007 paper.
My comments were purely of this peer-reviewed IEEE paper, and supporting NASA references, always thoroughly linked for verification. It is not my theory, i have not connection to it.
Might i acknowledge OutbackManyEP, who atleast took the time to comment on the specifics, and explore the science. I also learnt a thing or two from him about comet tails, and the research community... I also appreciated the private messages of support. cheers. I will say no more.