Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Fabulous image Martin and an interesting conundrum. Your FSQ106N is showing off the fluorite elements with the rich colour. You most likely would not have gotten that richness of colour from the later FSQ106ED.
Yet the FSQ106ED has a reducer available that enables you to get a wider FOV easily (I have done the same shot) albeit at a lower resolution.
I feel the FSQ106N is the better scope overall for imaging despite the
convenience of some of the FSQ106ED's features.
But in this case it would require 2 panels ideally. You got some terrific richness of colour though that is spectacular and really makes the image.
Then again that reducer on the FSQ106Ed is a beauty. I wonder if someone could make a reducer for the 106N. For that matter I wonder if the new reducer does in fact work on the FSQ106N?
Greg.
|
What a load of cods wallop. Processing will lift, lower or transcribe the colour to whatever the imager requires. The same image captured with the same equipment and given to 20 people to process will result in 20 different images both in colour depth and end result.
Sorry Martin, a truely magnificent image with a huge field of view with superb detail throughout.