View Single Post
  #4  
Old 07-03-2010, 05:38 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,006
What intrigues me is that the 13.1" scope is about 3 times larger in light gathering capacity of the 8", yet the 8's f/4 ratio killed its bigger brother hands down! Amazing, Wavy, how the ratio works on extended objects.

Also, we struggled to see anything of the Sombrero in the 13.1" last night- the moon was hard on its heels. Yet again the 8" f/4 prevailed! Only half a stop difference between the two.

Oh, and the 28mm RKE I got from you Wavy is such a sweet match for the f/4 (actually, Peter and I call her 'F4'). NO coma noticeable in it. Yet the 15mm 68* EP I have, the coma is very, very noticeable, almost useless. I love it!

Used it with the filter on Eta Carina, WOW. And from Sydney. Can't wait to take her to a dark site.
Reply With Quote