|
@KenGeee again - I do not believe a NASA coverup is at hand.... I don't know why you keep pushing this conspiracy point? I already pointed out, with article link, NASA has agreed the consensus model "is no longer valid"? Again, you have no comment on specifics of any theories... just more credibility bashing dogma? Lets get back to the specifics of results...
Don Yeoman quote has summed it up very well indeed...
Electric comets - Predominately rock comet, Electrostatic discharges, forming thin filaments of charged particles (plasma filaments) as the tail, minimal/no ice required.... tails mainly not due to suns heat melting ice.
Standard model "Whipple" - Sublimating ice from the suns heat... dirty snowball, icey dirtball melts and forms tail... very long filaments not predicted by melting ice vapour.... but an inherent feature of charged plasma...
2 clear models... it is clear consensus needs to change, and will do so...
Last edited by Jarvamundo; 12-02-2010 at 10:01 AM.
|