|
Hi guys thanks for your comments... to clarify and correct... (i'm not sure if you viewed the theory in entirety) @Kenny i assume you mean hydrogen-fusion of the sun... yep i'm with you here Kenny... we'll also notice if you travel north or south enough... you'll see some brilliant auroras channeling in filaments... yep the suns hot "plasma", reaching us through the magnetosphere...
my point here is plasma shouldn't be regarded as a dirty word here... just a common state of matter... one of the names mentioned above received a nobel prize for explaining such effects.
@Trevor, the electric model suggests that the comets are not "plasma"... it predicts they are predominately rock...
The "plasma" in this comet context, refers to the dust coming off the comets surface forming large filaments of charged particles.... i just don't see how simple sun-melting water/ice will do this?
Will look into the Giotto probe reports... from memory i thought that one was smashed up by rock flying off the comet? Although i see a few images from it...
I have yet to find any predictions or explanations of the double flash measured with the deep impact mission.... I also just don't get how essentially melting "ice" and "water" can cause that? An electrostatic release does make sense here...
Granted the "nasa" cover up rant at the start might be a bit much... i'm less concerned and generally ignore the rants of the youtube commentator and look more at the underlying theories and explanations of the scientists (ie... i'm clicking through and reading the papers from the nasa results sites here).... but yes i can see how those statements can offend.... us Gen-Y'ers generally see through this internet "noise"....
still don't have my answers tho gents... ?
Keen reader of mainstream... but it's not making sense to me here...
* Filaments of dust
* Double flash of impact
* How a tiny copper probe "smacking some ice" makes such a large blast...
Just not making sense to and open mind here gents...
Best,
|