View Single Post
  #12  
Old 28-01-2010, 06:57 PM
Bolts_Tweed (Mark)
Registered User

Bolts_Tweed is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Banora Point NSW
Posts: 480
Thanks fred

It seems strange but makes sense when you think about it. To get faint detail I expose lobnger without going too far which ends up with larger stars. To get smaller stars I expose less and miss faint detail.

There could be some serious pinching going on here soon.

I am going out to the obersvatory tonight to give the AP a work out over the weekend so I will experiment with exposure times in 6nm Ha (10 minutes plus) on somthinbg like the horsehead (not again !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) but it seems like a good target at the moment - a little further from the moon than the Rosette plus it will frame better in the f8.

Seems strange me trying to minise exposures - I was taking 30 minutes with in camera darks with the 350D not too long ago to get faint dust under the horsehead. Time to push it bit

Thanks Fred

Mark
Reply With Quote