Hmmm.
This image puzzles me a tad.
You always ask for critique, so instead of my usual praise i'll attempt this one.
Let me say first of all, it could be my monitor but I think it is not.
Is this image a tad too saturated? I dig your usual selective lumination but, I'm getting a smack in the face from the saturation in this image.
Secondly, my brain is telling me even though it is a beautiful image, the lumination of the falls is next to impossible, unless there is a second sun behind us. Due to the angle of the falls and the sun cast on the hill, lumination should be much lower on the falls.
This is a beautiful scene and like I said it could be my monitor, yet all your other images look great on it.
By no means is this any improvement on your image, yet only an illustration of what I mean. When I personally see this scene I would imagine it to look like the edit. I believe it is substantial enough to hold it's own without the extra "PoP".
Please don't take any offence to the image, I will remove it on your request. I know you are the master, everything I have learned about landscape lumenescence has been from your images. This image just puzzles me a bit.
Great image by the way, those are spectacular falls.