View Single Post
  #26  
Old 25-01-2010, 09:21 AM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by mithrandir View Post
Venus is not like earth. It is closer to the sun, so higher solar input, so its gasses are more energetic. It is smaller, so less gravity, so less able to retain hydrogen. The sun swept up more of the hydrogen in the inner solar system than in the outer. What do you need to have to make water to react with the carbon and sulphur dioxides?

As was said before. It's really easy to censor anyone whose research you don't happen to like. You just stop them getting any funding. You don't invite them to conferences. You don't quote them in the mass media.

This applies equally to any science. Not just climate. Has anyone considered how stem cell research was being blocked to satisfy some churches?

I'm not defending the quiz. I want real science. Not the media circus we get.
I was pointing out VENUS as a result if we are leading EARTH to a runaway greenhouse effect I fail to see the argument if we are wrong about the danger to earth then we will have some financial difficulties because of the measures taken to combat it but if we are right and we don't take steps to counter the effects we will still have financial difficulties as well as having to cope with climate change. But if we are right and do take steps to counter the effects we will still have the financial difficulties sure but we may actually survive to me it seems an easy choice Survival of civilization with financial difficulties if Global Warming is real human caused or otherwise or the end of our civilization as we know it with the financial difficulties as well. BTW I don't see that anyone is being censored noone has censored any of the things being said in this forum as long as it is civil towards each other.