|
Ah, the classic formula of:
+ anecdote from a "senior academic"
+ a government/political/commerical conspiracy
+ silencing "the truth"
You know, that's almost exactly the same formula used by 911, moon landing, JFK assassination, etc. conspiracy theorists.
You would think that in the days of the Internet, any censorship on the benefits of increased CO2 and global warming would be difficult. It is not like one can not anonymously publish information on the internet.
You would think that there would be more evidence than simply claims of conspiracies and blatant censorships, which are incidentally so ineffective as to silence the poster.
You would think that given the number of people involved, some of them would have a conscience and speak up. But apparently not - all climate scientists are greedy people with cold hearts and not a shred of dignity or integrity. If only my girl friends can be so good with a secret.
Last edited by freespace; 24-01-2010 at 11:32 PM.
|