Now where was I?
My point is this ... who really knows anything that is not based on a belief
...I dont think any idea formed or entertained by any human is assured of infalibility (except in the mind of the holder of that idea)... but I do prefer a "push" style of gravity rather than the standard model approach that needs a mythical construct called super symetry and other "universes" where the force of gravity leaks to such that it can be a weak force in this universe.. gravity is not a weak force just because humans can not dtect "all of it"...
I find that approach to science laughable and have no difficulty in regarding it as highly suspect ....yet the standard model is current
belief as to how it all works... each particle has super partners??? things popping into and out of exsistence ???...really how can anyone go for such an approach?
I am surprised anyone buys this approach with absolute belief they are correct and they have all the answers...but respect their right to believe what they like...
Those advocating the standard model as being solid science need to throw light on all their "dark" matters before saying other views are wrong...those who let their imagination run wild but then try to exclude others from the game should review their elitist approach...
It is unfortunate we have folk who seek to eliminate alternative views because they know they are right and everyone in opposition are wrong.
alex