View Single Post
  #26  
Old 30-12-2009, 11:07 PM
Nesti (Mark)
Registered User

Nesti is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I'd want some clarification here.

You're saying particles (vis: Baryon Boson, Fermion, Hadron, Lepton, Meson & Quark) have "conscious awareness" ?

To me that's like saying a rock, "knows" its a rock. Sorry, I don't think a rock is any more sentient than an electron.

And no maths?! Bold claims require strong evidence, and maths is an imperative in any physical theory....along with an ability to predict events and be tested.

65,000 odd words is to be sure is a big effort, but to paraphrase Feynman, unless you can explain it, succintly, to a barmaid, you don't truly have a handle on the subject.

So...I'm pulling the beer. Swan Larger or Fosters?
No, I've already spend 4 years writing almost full-time, I'm not prepared to repeat the process right here, right now, simply because you don't like what I suggest.

Instead of pulling beers, if you want to know exactly what I'm alluding to, visit Amazon and find out.

OR, you could write down you own ideas if you have any you would like to share?! But if you do, be wary, there are people out there who don't like other people having thoughts and ideas. They opt to attack their suggestions without first getting to know what they are saying and whey they are saying it. They also tend to rest upon the efforts of others to do so.

The word "Theory" is your choice of wording, not mine. I know what a theory is, to which everything I have written on this forum and within the book is not...and cannot be??? It is in fact a Hypothesis without a testable procedure, ergo, a series of suggestions, therefore I need no mathematics whatsoever. I have stated it is a suggestion all along. It seems some people don't listen.

Last edited by Nesti; 30-12-2009 at 11:36 PM.
Reply With Quote