Chris Plimers book was reviewed by an astrophycisist and was found to be wanting in both facts and deductive reasoning. The ridiculous amount of references were misquoted when it really mattered. The rest were there as padding to a tome which has no basis in reality.
Here from that august anti Global Warming Journal the Australian!
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news...-1225710387147
As a retired physicist I am well aware of the complexity of the variables and the so called driving forces of our climate. Note I said Climate which is a long term global average not local weather.
I am personally sad at the number of commentators and journoes that can barely integrate or differentiate the exponential to the power x. Yes this is a trick question! They then have the nerve to denigrate climate models they cannot even begin to understand.
Even if you think the climate models are wanting can you ignore the many signs that something is terribly wrong. I could write several pages of really obvious signs of change.
The Sun has been totally exonerated as a driving factor so what is the cause?
Bert