Thread: Celestron C9.25
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 09-10-2005, 08:57 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbeal
Houghy,
I would have to be the biggest fan of the Mak design on this forum, but I might not agree entirely with you when you suggest a $1200 Mak over a C9.25", sorry.
There are Maks, and there are Maks. I would want to see them both in the flesh first.
As an example, my MN76 is about US$2500 to buy new, and it is only 7". OK, maybe I paid too much, but the quality is definitely there. The 8" version was about twice that price. But I conceed it does all relate to your expectations. Best advice is try it first, especially at a star party, if you can.
Gary

Gary, I wasn't saying that this OTA was vastly superior, but just that a mak was more for planetary work, and that there was a cheap version that size available, I think if he did his research he would pass out at the cost of one that size from a decent manufacturer (as you have pointed out).

the little M500 Intes I bought recently has knocked my socks off. it is an exceptional scope and I am more than impressed.
Reply With Quote