View Single Post
  #17  
Old 10-12-2009, 06:56 AM
supernova1965's Avatar
supernova1965 (Warren)
Buddhist Astronomer

supernova1965 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phillip Island,VIC, Australia
Posts: 4,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
I we had kept Apollo going I doubt NASA would have had any funds left for anything else. Besides we haven't sorted out growing food or having an eco-system in an isolated environment yet to sustain people. Moon or Mars bases are still a long way away I reckon. Think about what all the shuttle has accomplished. We got Hubble up there for a start. That alone justifies it. We know a lot more than we did 10yrs ago.

Might the reason we haven't sorted out growing food or eco-systems is because we shifted focus from the moon and beyond to Low Earth Orbit. Hubble and the ISS could both have been launched using APOLLO type technology and I think we would have learned a hell of a lot more. I still think that there will be a place for a Shuttle in the future if the space elevator doesn't become viable I think they will get that working someday.
Reply With Quote