Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave
Here is a chap who has gone into it rather deeply  (in my view)... and he used more than one sheet of paper so he must be good  ...and just look at the books he has read  .
ANYWAYS my point is there are many others who like the idea of push seemingly less crazy than me...well that is not hard I expect .
http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-intro.asp
ANYWAYS such a site tells me I dont have to worry about the matter as there are many others who like the idea (surprising if you note some of the names)
alex  |
Alex,
At the very least you should provide supportive evidence for own ideas.
Given that you have proposed a multitude of push
particle candidates over the years, to produce an example which is the very antithesis to push particles (the use of electromagnetic radiation for doing the "pushing" instead of particles) is very strange.
Here is EMRP shot down in flames.
http://scienceblogs.com/goodmath/200..._physics_1.php