|
Onya Enchilada for putting this idea forward.
To what extent do you think this would present information which overlaps with the Quasar publication Astronomy 2010? What would distinguish this from that hallowed publication?
I would be happy to contribute some observing notes on specific objects if the publication has traction. I say this because Astronomy 2009 (and all of its predecessors) have shown a bias towards solar system objects. Whilst there are constellation maps and a Messier list (and a few other items) near the rear, there is nothing detailed on deep sky objects in the Quasar Publication.
I would like to see a collaboration with the compendium idea if that is at all possible.
|