|
Bert,
What you describe is quite sensible, but I wonder whether it should apply in this case? University academics have 'academic freedom' to comment on any topic in their field of expertise without having to ask permission from the Head, Dean or VC. Given that we pay their wages I think that it is appropriate that they contribute to debate on matters of public interest. Of course if their are commercial considerations that is different. Yes, sometimes the freedom is abused (false accusations were made here a few years ago and an academic at Macquarie came out with some racist statements) but overall it is a good idea (both the individuals I'm refering no longer work for for unis - in fact I don't think they are employed at all).
Given that this 'gagging' involved a matter of public interest (the ETS) and was made by someone with qualifications in the field I think his point of view should be heard. If his opinion is flawed surely CSIRO or the govt can find another expert to debate him? Unless of course there are no experts willing to support the ETS.
|