[Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)]

Inconsistencies do not in themselves serve to disprove any theory. They are merely questions.

One theory (and I'll call both approaches "theories - because they are just that) at least attempts to assert itself logically and, if I can look back here, no-one has claimed that it is fact. I'm pretty convinced though, I must add. It will, one day, serve to debunk the second theory when all the loose ends are irrevocably tied up, and I suspect that they will be.

The other.... well... you either believe it or you don't. Nothing more.

Actually - I'm interested to know whether proponents of religion (I'll drop the "R" word - we're grown up here) can typically see and even acknowledge the logic behind the theory of evolution, irrespective of whether they "believe" that it is proven or not, or even can be.