Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterM
Candy coating.
For me it is simply politics interfering with science, effectively censoring.
Click on the link in Les's post and read the article in The Australian if you haven't already - "even if comments were not associated with CSIRO". If it is even half right there are real issues in the CSIRO in protecting what the charter was apparently meant to protect -academic freedoms.
PeterM.
|
Well.. whoever works for CSIRO and does not like this, he/she can always resign.
When noone is left behind, who will do the work???
But if they stay, that means that they agree with this. Or all is OK.
I do not see any controversy or problem here.