Quote:
Originally Posted by FredSnerd
Bojan,
I don’t share you're adherents to the rules I’m afraid. Sometimes the rules are just simply not right or unfair because they are made for the benefit of the rule makers and not us. Why shouldn’t we have unrestrained access to the expert opinion on this subject (and some would say life and death subject). How else do we form an informed opinion on the subject unless we are properly informed. As I see it the government could only be insisting on this because it only wants us to hear what it has to say. For me I would never let them tell me what I’m allowed to hear and see and I don’t care what rule book they quote me.
|
Perhaps I was not clear and precise enough: by "rules" I did not mean only "rule book", I had a much broader term in mind.
What I meant was, the "human animal" behaves according to certain rules and other (humans) must play accordingly..
They will try to do anything (consciously or not) to have their way, and we must understand and accept this reality and counteract, without making the same "mistake" (if we can..)
You said it yourself,
Quote:
Originally Posted by FredSnerd
they are made for the benefit of the rule makers and not us.
|
Well... we are not the rule makers, and that's the fact (sad? yes, but true).