Hi Allan & All,
I couldn't get the link Allan posted to work without authorisation. On the assumption others might have found the same difficulty here is a link to the article in the Australian today:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...-11949,00.html
Leaving to one side the rights or wrongs of the climate change issue for a moment, I find it a matter of considerable concern that a CSIRO scientist must obtain permission/approval before making a comment on his own behalf touching on a subject where he/she is expert.
The paragraph in the article, assuming it properly reflects the policy reads:
"The new policy forbids scientists from making comments, even in their private capacity,
if the remarks might affect "public confidence in CSIRO as a trusted adviser". If such a perception could arise, scientists are required to discuss the issue with their supervisor to "effectively manage risks"." (Emphasis added)
To me that lays down these rules:
(1) The CSIRO is right -- you cannot publicly comment otherwise in any capacity.
(2) If you work for the CSIRO and you hold an opinion that the CSIRO may be wrong apply rule 1.
(3) We must all sing off the same hymn sheet regardless of whether you might feel the words could be incorrect.
(4) If you think the words might be incorrect, speak to a supervisor who will ensure you are interpreting rules 1 and 2 correctly.
And who holds the "funding-reins" for the CSIRO?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink
Best,
Les D