Quote:
Originally Posted by FredSnerd
But David, there is always that risk. One can never confidently eliminate the risk of being caught esp if your target is the most high profile in the world (the president of the US). So why would one take such an extraordinary risk. Only if the consequences of not taking that risk were as or more extraordinary. That is, the stakes have to be so high that makes it worthwhile. But we dont really have any evidence of anyone whose back was pushed so far back against the wall that they would be motivated to do such a thing. Don't get me wrong. That could still have been the case but as far as I can see at the moment we really dont have anything credible to hang our hat on as far as that goes.
|
There were substantial motives for JFK's assassination, with several "organisations" being of investigational interest post assassination (I think I spelt that right lol). Several videos clearly show more than one shot, from more than one direction. Was LHO able to teleport from one side of JFK to another in a split second? I think not. LHO had military ties too - he was a trained marksman. Why such poor security around him (thus allowing Jack Ruby to assassinate him)? There are more holes in the non conspiracy theories than in the actual conspiracy theories imho.
Dave