View Single Post
  #10  
Old 31-10-2009, 08:14 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Image isn't here, Doug. It may not have uploaded properly.
Sorry I forgot to upload the image.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrobserver99 View Post
Fantastic image Doug!. The clarity and detail are excellent.
Thanks, clear skies do help a lot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidU View Post
Beautiful Doug !
Thanks David.

Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
lovely image Doug. Do yourself a favour - download pixinsight - the trial version (current) and try the Dynamic background extraction function (DBE) there are a few other functions as well.
Thanks David, I have downloaded a copy now all i have to do is work out what I am doing with it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RB View Post
Nicely done Doug !
I'm going to look into this PixInSight that Houghy keeps sprooking, sounds cool.

Do you have Gradient Xtreminator, that helps with gradients too.

Even though 253 is small with this setup, I kind of like the image scale, to see it floating out there.

Thanks Andrew, I have a copy but sometimes find it just better to mask and average blur the background does a better job overall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffkop View Post
Looks really good to me Doug. Stars are perfect and focus perfect and widerfield shots seem to give everything a home to me.
Thanks Jeff

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Very nice Doug plenty of detail for 5 minute exposures having a dark site to capture sure makes the difference on required exposure time to capture optimum SNR as you haven't lost any detail in the cropped version
Thanks Trevor, having nice clear dark skies makes a huge diference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mill View Post
Both pictures look good Doug
It could be my monitor or my eyes, but the back ground looks a tiny bit hanging to the green side (as i said it could be my eyes).
Thanks Martin, My laptop is due for a re calibrate so you could well be correct.
Reply With Quote