View Single Post
  #45  
Old 19-10-2009, 06:38 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by rally View Post
Prof Nielsen has released another paper and refutes his previous conclusions

Download his latest PDF here http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.0359

It seems to be a lot of statistical propositions and assumptions based on Random card draws than a traditional Mathematical proof.

Too much for me !

Rally
Don't worry about it. It's appears to be written in classic Jinglish (given the co-author is Japanese.)
Words invented (eg "miraculocity"), poor grammar etc.

I know having struggled with Japanese scientific and engineering documents translated into English for nearly 20 years.

The document is not terribly convincing, but not having the original article doesn't help.

Steven
Reply With Quote