|
My thoughts, without even having any experience in this field and therefore not corruptted by any real facts, is the predictive process although with its good points could have folk adjusting things to move things in the direction they seek.
AS I have said often science can not be corruptted but humans can and that does not mean anyhting other than not all folk will play the game without cheating to win.
I am very suspicious of the models produced to support climate change simply because of the various folk who seek profit from the fear mongering.
Carbon trading is there to do one thing in spite of how it is presented and that is to raise the price of energy to open the door for currently expensive neuclear power...in my view.
It is cleaer the NP folk set out to side line coal by geting the greenies focused upon it as being bad offering in its place a lovely clean efficient fuel... and they are winning the game folk who would nevcer consider NP now think well maybe we should think about NP otherwise we will lose the Great Barrier Reef and the Polar bears.
To think this country with a contribution to the carbon footprint of a mere 1.5% is to made to feel guilty by restating the situation on a per capita basis is simple trickery the mob buys ...I suspect the computer models developed by the NP lobby could be slanted to support their addgendah...
But on the positive humans have the ability to think things thru and hopefully temper results with a consideration of the benefits that may accrue to those commissioning construction of the model.
alex
|