Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave
Jeez Mark I reckon it is easier to believe in God than to believe in SS... in fact I think one could muster more proof to prove God than SS.
I know math etc etc..but really I find the afront to common sence huge.
AND in fairness maybe I have misinterpreted the premise of SS but does it not propose a "super" partner for all particles in a "parrallel universe??? Put me straight please this is one case I hope I really have misinterpreted what I have read.
But I would be happy to have my views changed if there is any reasonable evidence besides what math running wild seems to have produced here.
alex
|
No, you don't have to have parallel universes at all. Super Symmetry is simply that for every particle in the current zoo (excluding the photon), we have a sister particle. Yes, they are expected to be super-massive, and as such decay very rapidly. If we create high enough energies, we should see super-massive particles emerge.
What they provide, is circumstantial evidence that we're looking in the right direction, as to which way to advance certain theories in particle physics.
I'm hoping that they find a Graviton/Gravitino pair.