Jokers? go and read the 4th IPCC report chapter 5 regarding rapidly rising sea levels, (below) and see who the joke is really on. It provides nothing to support a warming planet. Throughout it uses provisional words. "likely", "more likely","possibly", "expected", "inferred", "may". This is not science, it is a guess at best and more like hocus pocus, driven by the agendas of those who are and stand to make big bucks. The snake oil is back in circulation.
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-re...1-chapter5.pdf
I have Just read Ian Plimers's Heaven and Earth - it is well written, by a scientist who knows his stuff. This should be mandatory reading before entering this nonsensical debate that will have us all paying through the noses, lets see who supports it then.
PeterM.