View Single Post
  #26  
Old 04-09-2009, 11:10 PM
coldspace's Avatar
coldspace
Registered User

coldspace is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by FredSnerd View Post
EQ Mounts do seem complicated to manouver though and somewhat more difficult to lug around - Is what I'm thinking
It seems that you are only going to be using the scope for visual ?
If so, then only go the fork mount, and if you want to try simple but very effective imaging then you can use a fork mount with an astro video of some sort like a Mallincam, Stellacam, gstar. or put the scope on a wedge.

The video systems are the go to enhance your viewing pleasure especially in light polluted environments.
My LX200R 12 inch-coupled with a Mallincam hypercolour cooled video is a deep sky killing machine.

Claude, I have had no issues with my 12 LX200 mount in the two years, and I have several friends with LX200 scopes who use either fork mount/field derotators to various success, or wedge mount with very good results too plain old ALT/AZ forkmounts for visual or Astrovideo systems with great success.

A good friend of mine PeterM on this site has used his LX200 12 inch in Alt/Az mode and doing 25 second exposures has discovered 3 super novas and he has used his scope probally 3 to 6 hrs a night for over 400 nights in 3 odd years with no problems.

Yes they are not perfect for long, many hrs of exposure imaging but for what I think your after it fits the bill.


Matt.
Reply With Quote