|
Cheers Trevor
Actually, you raise a point that must be discussed. Do we need to impose a base-line quality standard on images supplied, or do we just print what we get as someones "best" image, as long as it is mechanically suitable for press (i.e adequate resolution)?
I tend to bend toward the latter. I don't think that anyone should have to compete with the quality that others are able to produce. If a shot is someones best shot - then so it should be treated as just that, and included for that very reason.
So - I think that everyone should be able to make up their own mind as to whether or not a shot they've produced with their own equipment is good enough to sit alongside other images in the same book - some of which will be world-beating. There will be no competition, and I'd like to suggest that images are presented in authors name order.
|