|
I've owned my VC200L for many years. I haven't looked throught an ACF so can't comment on it.
I now use my scope only with a camera attached. Having never used anything else I didn't understand all the hassles others have with coma and needing field flatteners etc.
The VC200L has round stars to the edge of a 35mm film frame.
When I did try imaging through an APO refractor I then realised how good the VC200l is. The refractor has better contrast but needs a field flattener. This is a major hassle.
I like the diffraction spikes and they are a great focus aid.
Visually the diffration spikes arn't noticeable. Contrast on planets isn't great but I have only compared it to a 14" celestron that does show planets better. My 127mm refractor is no better on planets visually than the VC200l.
Good luck deciding.
|