Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW
Will it help pick the Lotton numbers ????
|
WOW, this is a really important experimental outcome. But I’m way more interested in the 80% and 90% hit outcomes than the physical gate (OOPS, it's not even a 'physical' gate, is it??? It's a super-positioning of all possible gates. A hologram of switches?!). This may present something startling to the world, as one of the possible outcomes of quantum processing, something several scientists are actually predicting, is evidence of free will [interference] at the particle level.
TrevorW - I realise that you were joking, but from what I know, if it conforms to Everett’s ‘Relative State’ formulation (otherwise known as ‘Many-Worlds’ interpretation), then yes, it could, in principle, be capable of offering a correct set of lotto numbers, but only if it disproves Aharanov’s “Time-Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics”. I’m sure Bell’s celebrated ‘Inequality’ would have something to say about it also. This would mean that the universe was entirely deterministic, ergo, knowable, and without freedom.
To achieve this, might rescind Einstein’s Special Relativity, in that no information or influence can travel faster than light; and that would include influence from the future, as the future is most definitely non-local (and thus a quantum property). A line between local and non-local events would also be drawn in the sand.
Personally, I feel we will never achieve future knowledge. The notion that we can know, in advance, future ‘Freedom of Choice’ interactions is nonsensical.
That being said, the 80% and 90% true outcomes may not be reducable, in that ‘Freedom of Choice’ interactions affect all events. So according to Aharanov’s work, we are “PROTECTED” from the future, and thus quantum states are preserved. This could mean that the 80% and 90% are the deterministically driven portions, which are knowable, and the remainder is freedom driven, and ultimately, unknowable.
You might be saying, “so what”, well to give you an idea as to the importance, time itself may be an outcome, just an effect, created between deterministic events and the influence of ‘Freedom of Choice’. So quantum processing is kind of like a prism which separates all the different colors of light, out of the original white light, but in this case it is separating events and behavior.
If anyone wants to PM me an email address, I’ll email you Aharanov’s white papers, the importance of the 80% and 90% figures will immediately become obvious.