Quote:
Originally Posted by astroron
You are not the judge and jury on this site  |
???
All written text has its pros and cons. Subjective or false statements, especially in the media, are crucial to correct and/or expose. IMO the BBC Science site is poorly expressed and tends to state sensationalism over the facts.
This BBC article here has many flaws and deceptions. Are we suppose to ignore them, and lead others here astray? In the end, all I've done is state an opinion.