Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut
Looks promisng Ieinad, wouldnt bother with so many exposure options though, 4 sets of darks is a bit too much work.
|
Yeah. I'll process them all int their respective ISO runs, and see what difference is noticable between them. didnt think of doing that inititally
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
F9 is a bit harder. Which of the ISOs you used gave the best result? The ISO1600 or the ISO800? ISO 400 coupled with F9 is probably way slow.
Greg.
|
ISO800 seemed to provide the best results. i'll have to process them all individually, to get an idea of the adv/dis-adv of each.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tandum
Very square stars .. looks like a typical VC200L shot to me 
What was someone saying about lack of colours in DSLR star shots, plenty of colour here
I've found shorter exposures reveal just as much detail as longer ones with the Vixen. ie: 10 minute subs give me as much data as 20minute subs with the reducer. It could be I was just swamping the camera  but I found the same thing the other week with the starlight camera. 10 minute subs showed as much detail as 15 minute subs? suck it and see I guess |
Interesting. Soon as the FR arrives, I'll do a few tests and let you know how it goes.